Competition Refresher Magazine

Competition Refresher Magazine

Competition Refresher Magazine Published this article page no 47 the case dealt with a petitin against the kerala gvernment challenging the cmpulsry acquisitin f his land by the gvernment under the kerala land refrms act 1963 as a vilatin f fundamental rights (frs) as enshrined in  articles 25 26 and 31 f the cnstitutin f india. the case was heard by a bench f 13 judges — the largest frmed in the supreme curt (sc). as hearing prceeded the scpe f the case was expanded t address the fllwing interpretatin f glakhnath case  interpretatin f the article 368 (pwer f parliament t amend the cnstitutin) the validity f the 24th cnstitutinal amendment act sectin 2 and 3 f the 25th cnstitutinal amendment act and 29th cnstitutinal amendment act. utcmes f kesavananda bharati case upheld the validity f the 24th amendment sc held that parliament had the pwer t amend any r all prvisins f the cnstitutin (including frs) with a cnditin that the amendments shuld nt alter damage r destry the essential features r the fundamental principles f the cnstitutin. this came t be knwn as the basic structure doctrine Competition Refresher Magazine buy.

Competition Refresher Magazine